(no subject)

[xp_darcy]

I swear I saw a small child (4? 7? idk kindergartenish?) and a blue not-quite-adult I don't recognize wandering around...

WHY AM I IMAGINING CHILDREN

Comments

[xp_cypher]

you are not imagining children

although the explanation won't make any more sense

because uh

time shenanigans

[xp_tarot]

oh you can give me an explanation in a single text message but not anyone else

[xp_cypher]

because nobody else in this mansion has over a decade of experience with me and my offhand references

[xp_darcy]

...and i cannot even blame the usual suspects because they are not HERE. who did this, who disrupted the meta????

[xp_cypher]

funnily enough

a wizardwitch did it

[xp_darcy]

time shenanigans AND magic? i can't decide if that's better than a scientist ripping a hole in time and space or not.

[xp_cypher]

i mean

i know who your top two suspects are

and uh

see angie's reply below

[xp_tarot]

one of those is acceptable and I have naked sketches the other is no

[xp_darcy]

Part of my brain is like "naked sketches, oh?" and the other part is like "he will kill you, do NOT"

[xp_sylocke]

Pardon me if it is not so, but I was led to believe you have naked sketches of most people?

[xp_tarot]

Most of anyone of-age, yes. It is for reasons of The Future.

also for art.

I also have roughly sixty sketches of Quentin, because I think he hates clothing.

[xp_sylocke]

I have noticed that about Quentin. But then again, I have apparently attempted to stab him repeatedly so I suppose that means we should be about on par as far as roommates go.

Should you require new models I could be persuaded. For reasons of the Future. Or art.